We build OT cyber security as a single, integrated operating model — designed, governed, and embedded into how the organization operates. Not a collection of disconnected tools.
We do not treat OT security as isolated domains. Instead, we build an integrated ecosystem where each capability enables the next as part of a cohesive operational model.
We work with asset owners and operators to improve security maturity in a structured, sustainable way — aligned to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, adapted for OT.
Evaluate the current OT security posture against the six-capability lifecycle. Agree the initial focus area based on impact and feasibility.
Work with engineering, operations, and security stakeholders to shape the priority capability — tailored to operational requirements.
Embed capabilities into day-to-day operations and extend consistently across sites — enabling sustainable improvement at scale.
We define the structure, processes, and operating model that enable organizations to build and sustain their OT cyber security capability.
We help organizations define how OT security is structured, governed, and executed as a single integrated system rather than independent functions.
This includes defining how teams, processes, and capabilities operate together across the OT environment, how decisions are made and governed, and how execution is coordinated consistently over time.
Through this structure, responsibilities become clearly defined, operational workflows are aligned, and individual functions contribute to a coherent and repeatable security capability.
Outcome: A fully defined OT security structure that connects people, processes, and capabilities into a consistent model that can be executed across the organization.
A resilient OT security program depends on accurate and continuously maintained asset knowledge embedded within operational practice, not static tooling outputs.
We help organizations establish and maintain a reliable OT asset inventory that is embedded into operational and engineering processes — defining how systems are registered, managed, and how configuration and change are controlled over time.
Outcome: A sustainable and operationally embedded asset management capability that provides reliable visibility of OT environments and can be maintained as part of normal engineering practices.
We help organizations define how OT risk is assessed based on real operational impact, not just technical vulnerability.
This includes establishing a structured approach to system criticality and consequence-based assessment aligned to safety, availability, and operational impact.
Outcome: A repeatable, consequence-driven risk framework that enables consistent decision-making based on operational impact and plant criticality.
Network architecture forms the backbone of protection in OT environments. Security is achieved through the engineered design of zones and conduits — including the definition of zone boundaries and the selection of appropriate conduit strength based on operational and security requirements.
This establishes controlled communication paths between systems and limits the spread of disruption across environments, supporting safe and predictable system behavior during normal operations and cyber incidents.
Outcome: A defensible OT architecture that reduces the spread of operational disruption, strengthens resilience, and provides a stable foundation for all downstream security capabilities.
We help organizations build OT detection capability that reflects real plant behavior and is aligned with the underlying architecture — meaningful in an operational context and supported by engineering and operations teams.
Outcome: A detection capability that is aligned to real OT behavior and operational context.
Our OT incident response approach is built around operational control rather than isolated cyber response activities — integrating engineering, operations, cyber, and wider organizational stakeholders into a single coordinated response structure while preserving plant operations and safety.
We design OT-specific incident response structures so cyber, engineering, and operations teams can act in a coordinated and timely manner during cyber events, with response integrated into operational decision-making for clarity and control under pressure.
Outcome: A coordinated response capability that supports safe and controlled decision-making during disruption.
We help organizations design and implement structured recovery processes for restoring OT environments following disruption or cyber compromise, with recovery activities integrated into operational processes to enable cross-functional coordination during restoration.
We also ensure recovery is not treated as an isolated activity, but as part of a broader operational lifecycle that supports long-term resilience and system stability.
Outcome: A structured recovery capability that enables safe restoration of plant operations and embeds recovery into everyday operational practice.
Regulatory and assurance expectations are reflected in the design of structured OT cyber security capabilities within the operating model — establishing clear governance, defined processes, and consistent operational control across asset management, risk, architecture, detection, incident response, and recovery.
As these capabilities are implemented, operational evidence and artefacts are produced to support regulatory assurance activities and compliance requirements.
Outcome: A consistently governed OT environment where regulatory evidence is generated through day-to-day operational practice and system design.
Whether you are building OT security capability from the ground up or maturing an existing program, we would welcome the opportunity to discuss how we can help.